I have seen several photos and videos of 701's with an A-65 engine.  I am getting near completion on my 701 and have access to an A-65 with two hours SMOH.  Does anyone have knowledge of what sort of performance this combination would have? Also, any ideas for a motor mount?  Any info would help.  Thanks.

Views: 298

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't have any direct knowledge of this combination but there have been a lot of good, successful airplanes that have flown behind this engine.  It wouldn't win any STOL contests, but it will get you in the air.  Depends on your expectations and if its a good deal.

Hi Gary,

       Thanks for your note. Aside from getting a great deal on the engine, I am a bit older than most on here, so my "need for speed" has diminished over the years.  Low and slow will be just fine. Thanks again.

                              Henry

Henry it's your choice. I was flying behind a Jab 2200 (80 hp) I wasn't happy. The 701 is a draggy slow aircraft. not known for speed. Your age has nothing to do with it. put a 912uls and enjoy true low and slow flight. The extra hp will be useful when the ground sneaks up on  you when going a little to slow. I took a ride in a 701 with a 582. I will never do that again. with the extra hp you will be able to give a grandchild or friend a ride and never have to worry that the engine will get you off the ground.

I built with the Jabiru 2200 on a Rev-4 CH701 and while it is satisfactory for my needs it is no better than the Rotax 532 power that I once had a ride in.

Previously I flew a Cessna 150 with the O-200 which I could have used for the 701, the main disadvantage is the weight which is around 220 lbs if you include electric starter, so if your 701 is the later plans for 1100 lbs you could manage that installation (there is the extra vibration to consider, early 701 had more fragile H.Stab brackets and had to be beefed up for the Rotax 100 hp)
Unlike the Jabiru, which makes power at 3300 rpm, the -65 , -75, -85 Continentals can swing a larger prop so despite the lower hp rating you will probably do similar to a J2200 or Rotax 582.
Having spent 12 years with a Continental I'm inclined to prefer that setup. Carbs and ignition with well known track record is a factor.
Ralph

A lot of  701’s with a heavy engine folds their front gear. It’s not designed for that much weight up front. That leads to a prop strike, cowling damage, new prop,new engine,  new firewall...is it worth it?

Well Henry, I have about 250 hrs on my 701 with a Continental C85 12, it flys great,no issues with CG. 670lbs. I think the A65 would be a little low on HP though. Zenith does have a mount for a continental engine, I bought one, then modified it. I run a 68” 3 blade warp drive prop. Check out my Zenith page or you tube page for my flying videos. BTW I flew from Washington state to Oshkosh this summer in my plane 55 hrs 3700 miles. Do your homework and don’t believe all the myths that continentals are too heavy.
You tube page https://www.youtube.com/user/dlorr701
If you have questions give me a call
360-670-9725
Thanks
David

Hello Henry,

Here is a talk from first hand flyer of a CH-701 with A-65. Very stock with a exception of 'NO SLATS'. This gave me additional 6-8 mph cruise without affecting any other flight phase performance. (Yes, it does't do the 'hanging by the prop' show off but performance overall is quite satisfactory). I do have a second 701 with Rotax 912 UL so the comparison is very practical and first hand. here is a recent video of formation take off:

https://youtu.be/iaFll8zEYtc

Performance: Cruise all day at 80MPH @ 2100RPM burning 3.5 GPH. Dual climb is about 700 fpm @65MPH and solo I can do over 1000 fpm. Will not climb like a typical STOL 701 but do climb much better than a Cessna 150/152.

No offence to anyone but I have to disagree with some of the comments. The total weight difference of 912 with all fluids and accessories is about 22lbs less than a A-65. When Zenith used to sell mounts for this engine and provide support then how can we say that the plane was not designed for this powerplant? On the other comment, I have seen multiple nose collapses on 701 ( and other planes) with rotax and even BMW engine and I don't think the blame is on design or weight of the engine in those cases.

Keeping in mind that I do have an aircraft with 912 (so no bias), I would prefer flying behind a continental any day because of their simplicity, ease of maintenance, availability of parts, proven and rugged technology and technical experience available.

Hope this helps you make a educated decision. 

If you have questions give me a call @ 1-647-887-4284

PS: I just picked up a CH-601HD project and am considering putting a O-200 in it.

 

RSS

New from Zenith:

Zenith Planes For Sale 
 

Classified listing for buying or selling your Zenith building or flying related stuff...

                                                     

Weather Maps


Custom Instrument Panels
for your Zenith
:

Custom instrument panels are now available directly from Zenith Aircraft Company exclusively for Zenith builders and owners. Pre-cut panel, power distribution panel, Approach Fast Stack harnesses, Dynon and Garmin avionics, and more.


Custom Upholstery Kits for your Zenith Aircraft:

Zenith Vinyl Upholstery Kits


Zenith Apparel from EAA:


Zenair Floats


Flying On Your Own Wings:
A Complete Guide to Understanding Light Airplane Design, by Chris Heintz


Builder & Pilot Supplies:

How to videos from HomebuiltHELP.com

Developed specifically for Zenith builders (by a builder) these videos on DVD are a great help in building your own kit plane by providing practical hands-on construction information. Visit HomebuiltHelp.com for the latest DVD titles.

 

West Coast USA:

Transition Training:

Wheels & Wings

Pro Builder Assistance


 

Aircraft Spruce & Specialty for all your building and pilot supplies!

© 2019   Created by Zenith.Aero.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service