Online Community of Zenith Builders and Flyers
I've been requested by several Zenith builders to make this post so builders can ask questions about UL Power Aero Engines and I can respond publicly so other builders gain the benefit of the the exchange.
To start with here is a link to Zenith's webpage showing the Engine and FWF Kit pricing.
http://www.zenithair.com/kit-data/zac-ulpower.html
Regards,
Robert Helms
General Managar
UL Power North America, LLC
573 434 0075
Tags: Jabiru, Rotax, UL Power, ULPower, engine, motor, powerplant
Does anyone have any performance numbers (cruise speed and fuel flow, etc) for a CH750 running a UL350 engine?
Permalink Reply by Robert Helms on April 21, 2013 at 9:08am Hi Geoff,
The cruise speed of the 750 is really limited by the airframe more than the HP. If you cruise around 100 or so you will probably burn about 6 1/2 gallons and hour. If you go to full throttle you might see a little faster cruise but I'm not sure. If you slow down to 80 or so I bet you'll be around 5 gph.
In the new 750 Cruzer with the 350iS it does about 100mph on about 4 gph. Take it up to 2800rpm and it does 118mph and 6.5 gph.
I hope this helps.
Robert
Permalink Reply by Carlos Sa on April 12, 2013 at 8:25am Hello,
More than a year has passed since the start of this discussion, but not much activity.
Maybe now the user base is larger and we can have additional data points.
I am at a point where I need to make a decision on the engine for my CH601-HD (yes, "HD").
I was leaning towards the Jabiru 3300, but it looks like it's still having issues with heat.
I want something I can install and, except for routine maintenance, forget it.
So the question is, what have been the majour "pain point(s)" of the UL Power engines?
How many, per model, have been delivered so far?
What other statistics have been gathered?
For the Zodie HD, would the 260iS provide enough power?
Carlos Sa
Montreal, Canada
building from plans
Carlos,
I have a relatively recent-production Jab 3300 (#2427) in my STOL CH750. Early Jab's had a reputation for cooling problems, but the engines have been in continual improvement/development and engines beyond #2331 have a different head design, larger cooling fin area, deletion of external oil lines, hollow push rods, redesigned intake plenum, diffusers, and runners. It certainly took some tweaking to get the cooling correct in the 750, but it's a high drag/slow speed airplane and they're the hardest to get right. However, it was not too difficult to achieve and I enjoyed the process!
I have ZERO experience with a 601/650, but it's my take that with the clean airframe and higher speed, the Jab 3300's aren't particularly prone to cooling problems - perhaps someone can correct me if I'm wrong! With no more tweaking than I had to do for the 750, I think a recent production 3300 would be a piece of cake for the 601.
I'm not advocating you use a 3300, just saying it's a very different engine from earlier models. It still uses the Bing carb, but I have found it entirely satisfactory and appreciate the simplicity vs. fuel injection and the requisite extra fuel line plumbing, etc.
John
N750A
Permalink Reply by Carlos Sa on April 18, 2013 at 5:34pm John, thanks for the comments, I appreciate it.
The 3300 is on my "radar", but I am just starting my research.
Cheers
Carlos
Permalink Reply by Chris Aysen on April 19, 2013 at 8:27am Either of the Rotaxes, 80 hp or 100 hp, would be suitable with the 100 being the best choice. Compared Lockwood's price on the 80 hp to the Ul Power 260i and the Rotax was cheaper. If the price on Lockwood's page is right? No matter the gripes about their cost they are still the best engines for light sport aircraft.
My two cents.
Chris
Permalink Reply by Robert Helms on April 21, 2013 at 9:11am Hi Carlos,
I think we covered all your questions via email but in case others are wondering the same thing I thought I would post here too.
There is one Ch601 with a UL260i. The owner is happy with the performance. Most others have gone with the UL350iS as did Zenith in their demo plane. The added HP is more expensive but nice to have.
Keep in mind the "i" can use 91 octane and the "iS" needs 93 octane. You can use 100LL but the lead is not good so mogas is better.
Regards,
Robert
Permalink Reply by Robert Helms on April 21, 2013 at 9:13am I've started a new Technical Blog for ULPower. If anybody wants to join please send an email to me at RHelms@ULPower.Net.
Custom Instrument Panels
for your Zenith:
Custom instrument panelsare now available directly from Zenith Aircraft Company exclusively for Zenith builders and owners. Pre-cut panel, power distribution panel, Approach Fast Stack harnesses, Dynon and Garmin avionics, and more.
Zenith T-shirts and Hats:
Flying On Your Own Wings:
A Complete Guide to Understanding Light Airplane Design, by Chris Heintz.
The official Zenith Aircraft DVD has been updated with new footage and features, and now includes the STOL CH 750 and the ZODIAC CH 650.
© 2013 Created by Zenith.Aero.
Exlusive online community for active builders and pilots of Zenith Aircraft kits (Chris Heintz / Zenair light airplane designs).